0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àν¶¸° ºñÀÇÁ¸¼º ´ç´¢º´ ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÎÁö±â´É

Cognitive Function in Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetic Patients

ÀçÈ°°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 8±Ç 1È£ p.38 ~ 49
KMID : 0939320050080010038
Á¤¹ÌÇÏ ( Jung Mi-Ha ) - Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú

¼ÒÈñ¿µ ( So Hee-Young ) - Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the cognitive function in NIDDM patients.

Method: The data were collected at MI OPD in C University hospital. with Digit Span Forward & Backward, Trail Making Test-A, Trail Making Test-B, and MMSE.

Result: There were significant differences in DF, DB, TMT-A, and TMT-B according to gender, and in TMT-A according to living with spouse and comorbidity. There were significant differences in DF, DB, TMT-A, TMT-B, and MMSE according to monthly income, and in DF, TMT-A, and TMT-B according to hypertensive state. But, there was no difference in cognitive function score according to diabetes-related complication and diabetes treatment modality. There was a significant positive correlation between duration of NIDDM and TMT-A(r=.215, p=.025). The global cognition score was explained 42.1% of varient by age, duration of education, monthly income, and hypertensive state.

Conclusion: As above results showed, among age, duration of education, monthly income, and hypertensive state, prevented and managed hypertensive state which is modifiable factor may reduce or delay cognitive function impairment in NIDDM patients. And DF & DB, TMT-A & B could be more utilized as useful cognitive function measurements because those tests reflected cognitive function in NIDDM patients better than MMSE
KeyWords
Àν¶¸° ºñÀÇÁ¸¼º ´ç´¢º´ ȯÀÚ, ÀÎÁö±â´É
NIDDM, Cognitive function
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed